Food Processing Influences Metabolism And Brain Activity

TL;DR

Before you orderOffer from Amazon

Get kitchen staples and gadgets delivered free with Prime

• Fast, free delivery on millions of items
• Prime Video, Amazon Music and more included
• Member-only deals all year

Start your free Prime trial →Free trial for eligible customers · Cancel anytime

As an affiliate, we earn on qualifying purchases.Hide

In a study of 57 healthy adults, Virginia Tech researchers found that nutritionally matched meals with different processing levels produced distinct metabolic responses. Brain scans also showed processing-related differences in reward-system activity, although participants did not report valuing one type of food more than the other.

Virginia Tech researchers have reported that meals matched for calories and major nutrients but made with different levels of processing produced distinct metabolic responses and differences in brain activity in a study of healthy adults. The findings, published this month in Nature Metabolism, suggest food processing may affect how people respond to meals beyond what can be explained by calories, carbohydrates, fats, and proteins alone.

The study included 57 adults ages 18 to 45. Participants ate both a minimally processed meal and a highly processed meal in separate sessions, with at least three days between them. The meals were matched within 1 percent for calories, carbohydrates, fat, protein, water, salt, and weight, according to the researchers. The meals were classified using the Nova food-processing scale.

For the metabolic tests, participants fasted overnight and ate a 300-calorie meal in a metabolic chamber, which measures energy use. Researchers took blood samples immediately after eating and six more times over the next three hours. They measured insulin response, energy expenditure, and carbohydrate oxidation. The researchers reported that the highly processed meal prompted a higher insulin response, slightly higher blood sugar for longer, greater energy expenditure, and less carbohydrate burning for fuel.

A group of 32 participants also completed brain-imaging sessions. While undergoing functional MRI, they viewed pictures of foods and reported how much they would be willing to pay for them. Researchers found differences in activity in parts of the ventral striatum, including the nucleus accumbens, involved in learning, motivation, and reward. They reported a link between differences in carbohydrate burning after the meals and brain responses to food images. Participants did not say they would pay more for either type of food.

Processing May Change Meal Responses

The findings add a possible biological pathway to research into why ultraprocessed foods have been associated with overeating and poorer health outcomes. The researchers’ design, matching meals on several nutritional measures, allowed them to examine whether processing level might matter in addition to those measures. The results point to possible differences in how the body handles a meal and how the brain responds to food cues.

That matters because ultraprocessed foods make up more than half of average daily calorie intake in the United States, according to the source report, and diets in many parts of the world are shifting toward them. The study does not establish that processing itself causes obesity, diabetes, heart disease, or changes in eating behavior. It does, however, identify responses that researchers can investigate in larger and longer studies.

How Researchers Compared the Meals

Many ultraprocessed foods are high in fat and sugar and low in fiber and protein, factors that can complicate comparisons with less processed foods. The Virginia Tech team sought to hold several nutritional characteristics steady while changing the meals’ processing level. One highly processed meal included small portions of a peanut butter and jelly sandwich, deli turkey, veggie chips, a cookie, cereal, instant mashed potatoes, and water. The minimally processed meal included banana, dried cranberries, cheese, and egg.

The study’s design compared each participant with themselves across two sessions, reducing some differences between individuals. Still, its small sample, short observation period, and specific meals limit how broadly the findings can be applied. The report describes immediate responses after single meals, not the effects of a long-term diet.

“If you look at that population-level data, people who consume large amounts of ultraprocessed foods have higher rates of poor health outcomes — obesity, cardiac events, Type 2 diabetes, and even some metrics of mental health.”

— Alex DiFeliceantonio, associate professor at the Fralin Biomedical Research Institute at VTC

Limits of the Short-Term Findings

The results do not show which features of processing produced the observed differences, or whether those differences persist with repeated consumption. The study also cannot establish that the metabolic or brain responses lead to overeating or long-term disease. Although researchers measured willingness to pay for pictured foods, participants did not report valuing either category more, and the imaging results are associations rather than proof that brain activity caused a behavior.

The source report does not provide the effect sizes or detailed statistical results for each measure. It is also unclear how well the findings generalize beyond healthy adults ages 18 to 45 or to other foods and meal sizes.

Further Research on Processing Effects

The findings identify questions for follow-up studies: which aspects of industrial processing matter, whether effects differ across people, and whether responses to single meals predict behavior or health over time. Larger studies with longer follow-up could test whether the reported metabolic changes recur and how they relate to actual food choices. The source report does not announce a specific next study or timeline.

Key Questions

What did the study find?

Researchers reported different short-term metabolic responses after participants ate nutritionally matched meals with different processing levels. Brain scans also showed differences in responses to food pictures.

Were the meals nutritionally identical?

They were matched within 1 percent for calories, carbohydrates, fat, protein, water, and salt, according to the study’s first author. They contained different foods and differed in processing level.

Does the study prove ultraprocessed foods cause disease?

No. It measured short-term responses to meals in healthy adults and cannot establish that processing causes chronic illness or overeating.

Did participants prefer one type of food?

Participants reported how much they would pay for pictured foods, and the researchers said they did not report willingness to pay more for either the highly processed or minimally processed foods.

How many people took part?

The full study included 57 adults ages 18 to 45. Of those, 32 completed both the brain-imaging and metabolic sessions.

Source: hn